Insolvency Law Committee submits its 2nd Report on Cross Border Insolvency Recommends adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law of Cross Border Insolvency, 1997
- Precedence is given to domestic proceedings
- Protection of public interest
- Greater confidence generation among foreign investors,
- Aadequate flexibility for seamless integration with the domestic Insolvency Law
- A robust mechanism for international cooperation
- Direct access to foreign insolvency professionals and foreign creditors to participate in or commence domestic insolvency proceedings against a defaulting debtor;
- Recognition of foreign proceedings & provision of remedies;
- Cooperation between domestic and foreign courts & domestic and foreign insolvency practioners;
- Coordination between two or more concurrent insolvency proceedings in different countries. The main proceeding is determined by the concept of centre of main interest (“COMI”)
Loading ad...
Insolvency Law Committee submits its 2nd Report on Cross Border Insolvency Recommends adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law of Cross Border Insolvency, 1997
- Precedence is given to domestic proceedings
- Protection of public interest
- Greater confidence generation among foreign investors,
- Aadequate flexibility for seamless integration with the domestic Insolvency Law
- A robust mechanism for international cooperation
- Direct access to foreign insolvency professionals and foreign creditors to participate in or commence domestic insolvency proceedings against a defaulting debtor;
- Recognition of foreign proceedings & provision of remedies;
- Cooperation between domestic and foreign courts & domestic and foreign insolvency practioners;
- Coordination between two or more concurrent insolvency proceedings in different countries. The main proceeding is determined by the concept of centre of main interest (“COMI”)